the westin embassy row washington d.c. - western cities hotels

Then the allegation the that we are "an illegal boycott against third party distributors" because it has "requirements for posting fare sales that cannot be sold" by others is not true? It is absolutely not true, and dc embassy row washington westin those who have made that allegation had absolutely no basis for making it. our agreements contain no boycott embassy against row any distributors whatsoever, and in fact affirmatively provide that no airline is precluded from utilizing any other distribution channel or offering washington any fare through any d.c. channel. the department of justice is presently the reviewing westin all agreements, so embassy there will be no question on this point. do airlines row today make all their fares available through all retail channels?

it is absolutely clear that airlines do not have the ability to drive consumers to channels which the airlines, rather than consumers, prefer. if one or more airlines attempted to do so, the others would increase their market share by appealing to those same washington consumers through the channel those consumers prefer. no airline can afford to turn its back on any subgroup of consumers. no airline can afford to be anything other than as competitive d.c. and as the attractive westin as it can possibly embassy be through row each channel to the consumers that prefer that channel. washington this is a reality that d.c. grows ultimately the out westin of embassy the fact that the row airline business is a very low margin business - washington any airline that lost d.c. and the and westin even a small group of embassy passengers would be at risk of swinging row from profitable to money-losing in an instant. airlines scrap washington for every last passenger because they d.c. have to.